Capehart and Pletka on Harris' immigration policy and Zelenskyy's meeting with Trump (2024)

Jonathan Capehart:

Well, she's doing it. She's going to the border. She's there. She will be speaking about it later this evening.

And by going to the border and talking about immigration, she — it does give her yet another chance. And she's been talking about this on the campaign trail — gives her another chance to talk about the bipartisan comprehensive immigration deal that was negotiated by Democrats and Republicans, the lead Republican, Senator Lankford of Oklahoma, one of the most conservative Republicans in the Senate.

Had all the votes, and then Donald Trump called up and said, don't vote for it, and it died, did not even come up for a vote. It gives the vice president an opportunity to talk about that bill, talk about the things that are in it, and talk about the fact that it had things in there that had her and the president going against their own party, because they were looking for a deal to do the exact thing Republicans say they were — they wanted to do and the exact thing the American people are saying they wanted addressed.

And that is securing the border, but also going further and reforming the immigration system. And Donald Trump didn't want it to happen because he didn't want to give Democrats an issue to run on.

Danielle Pletka, American Enterprise Institute:

We need a real leader to take on — that is not a felicitous term that they should have put at the end of that ad, because she's been that leader. This was part of her responsibilities. She didn't go to the border. She didn't make it an issue.

And I understand. I mean, look, the politics of this are clear. This is an issue where she lags behind Donald Trump, where she's perceived to be less good. And she can't just shrug off 3.5 years as vice president of the United States and suddenly say, we need new, fresh leadership to deal with that.

Where were you for the last 3.5 years? But I think, look, Jonathan makes an interesting point. And this is — this is not a — this is a problem for the Biden administration. The Supreme Court has said — and I'm going to read the quote.

It says — in a decision on immigration, it said that current statute — quote — "exudes deference" to the president. In other words, the president had and has all the authorities that are needed to do what was necessary to either shut down or regulate the flow at the border and to deport people if necessary.

None of that happened for the first three years of the Biden administration. Now, is it good that Congress wanted to address this? Yes. Am I a little bit ambivalent about how it was handled? I am, because I think it needed a solution. And I think sometimes you have to compromise.

The argument that many make who opposed it is that the president has these authorities and that the legislation actually limited those authorities. In other words, it would have superseded existing legislation and limited the ability of the president to shut down the border unless there was a certain number of people, an average of 4,000 to 5,000 at the border.

Now, that was the complaint against it. Is it fair? I prefer compromise and bipartisan solutions, but that's what happened. And it doesn't take away from the fact that Kamala Harris didn't do anything and Joe Biden didn't do anything.

Jonathan Capehart:

Look, I give President Zelenskyy major kudos and major props for meeting with Donald Trump. He could very well be the next president of the United States and meeting with a man who has said on multiple occasions that basically President Zelenskyy should just hand over his country to Vladimir Putin.

And so the fact that Donald Trump met with Zelenskyy after saying before that he wasn't going to meet with him because Zelenskyy said not nice things about him I guess shows a level of maturity of the former president.

But I do think, when a wartime president comes to the United States for the purpose of addressing the U.N., saying thank you to the people in the factory that are making the weapons that he's been able to use to defend his country, that is a good thing for him to do. And it's good that Donald Trump met with him.

Danielle Pletka:

It's a great question.

But I want to talk a little bit about Zelenskyy for a second, because I think he was manipulated, and I think he was manipulated cynically by the White House.

The trip to Pennsylvania that he was going to do, which was one of many trips that he, the ambassador, Ukrainian leadership, do to thank the American people and the people in factories — I agree totally with, Jonathan, this is a really appropriate thing to do — had none of the senators — Democratic senators on the trip on the original manifest, had a short meeting with Governor Josh Shapiro to sign a sister city agreement and otherwise was not a political setup, and ended up looking like a campaign visit.

Now, that wasn't organized by the Ukrainian Embassy. It was organized by the White House. I think Zelenskyy fell into that. I think he exacerbated that problem when he went and gave an interview to a house organ of the Democratic Party, "The New Yorker," and made, frankly, let's say, unwise comments.

I happen to agree with some of them, but unwise comments about J.D. Vance. But they created this firestorm. And, actually, I give a lot of credit not just to him in reaching out to Donald Trump to try to fix this, but Donald Trump being gracious and accepting that outreach immediately.

So I think that's really important to understand, because the one thing I haven't seen since this invasion happened is Joe Biden and Kamala Harris stand up and show the necessary bipartisan leadership to sell this to the American people. So what is it going to take?

I come back to your original question. It takes leadership. It takes effort. It takes the bully pulpit. People need to be persuaded.

(Crosstalk)

Capehart and Pletka on Harris' immigration policy and Zelenskyy's meeting with Trump (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Ray Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 6174

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (49 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ray Christiansen

Birthday: 1998-05-04

Address: Apt. 814 34339 Sauer Islands, Hirtheville, GA 02446-8771

Phone: +337636892828

Job: Lead Hospitality Designer

Hobby: Urban exploration, Tai chi, Lockpicking, Fashion, Gunsmithing, Pottery, Geocaching

Introduction: My name is Ray Christiansen, I am a fair, good, cute, gentle, vast, glamorous, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.